Pointblank: A Reply to Last Issue’s “Bike Borg” Story. The Bishop Public Lands Initiative, Local Control and Shared Values…by Ashley Korenblat

In 2013 I attended a San Juan County Commission meeting to talk with the commissioners about how the proposed public lands bill being considered by Congressman Bishop would affect the recreation economy of the region.


Ashley Korenblat. Photo by Jim Stiles.

Ashley Korenblat. Photo by Jim Stiles.

I am an outfitter and have lived in Grand County for 18 years. My company, Western Spirit Cycling runs multi-day bicycle trips on the public lands throughout the county, and is headquartered in Moab. I have served as the President of the International Mountain Bicycling Association (IMBA) and am now working with Public Land Solutions, a non-profit that works with government, businesses and other public land stakeholders on issues that affect gateway communities.

Congressman Bishop has begun the challenging process of crafting a public lands bill that would set the stage for the future of public land management in Eastern Utah. The work I did for IMBA included studying 30 similar federal land bills around the country.

While each bill involved entirely different specifics, they all included a great deal of blood, sweat, and tears on the part of locals such as hunters, loggers, conservationists, skiers, miners, firefighters, and climbers—to name just a few, as well as hundreds of thousands of dollars spent by national advocacy organizations that represent diverse stakeholders.

In some places people met for years to sort out all the issues and find ways to meet everyone’s needs going forward. And even though mountain bicycles are prohibited in federally designated wilderness areas, IMBA endorsed 28 of those 30 bills. You might wonder why we would support something that prohibits our use, and the answer is that the mountain bike community depends on public land in its natural state. A big part of mountain biking is being outside in the great outdoors.

But of course we use metal and oil and all kinds of resources to make the bikes themselves. The bills we support optimize the public lands. These bills sorted out who was going to do what where. They protected large amounts of natural places, while allowing for timber, mining, and oil and gas. They also resolved decades old debates that have tied everyone’s hands for years.

Most importantly, these legislative efforts all involved broad local support. The locals have used the legislative process to make their voices heard. They have worked with their neighbors to compromise, to zone, to plan balanced futures that don’t lock up all the land, but don’t use it all up either.

Yes the land is still owned by the federal government and yes it is federal legislation, but the people that wrote these bills have embraced their federal land and are making progress managing it for their future. We have that same opportunity right now in all of Eastern Utah. Winston Churchill once said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.” Writing legislation can be frustrating and terribly inefficient. We are guaranteed lots of challenging meetings, where people in circles, but in the end these public land bills are the best way to plan for the lands we all share.

And speaking of sharing, I think it is time to move beyond the concept of shared values. In the sound bite world we live in, we have all been reduced to one-sentence mission statements declaring our values, both in our own eyes and those of others, and we rarely bother to talk to those that don’t share our values.

Whether the label on your forehead says “save the earth,” “reduce government spending,” or “cling hopelessly to the Ed Abbey era”—it is time to start talking to people who don’t share your values. I don’t think the people who are for smaller government want their children to breathe bad air, anymore than I think the people who want to save the earth, want to give up all the modern conveniences of cars and cell phones. And by the way in Desert Solitaire, Mr. Abbey says: “Let our people travel light and free on their bicycles– nothing on the back but a shirt, nothing tied to the bike but a slicker in case of rain.”

Everything we do on this earth is a compromise, and living in a democracy is probably the most important. It is time for us to stop judging each other, and instead sit down and look at the maps. We own this land together and this is our chance to plan for its future.

Ashley Korenblat  is the Managing Director of Public Land Solutions.


Last issue, I wrote a long essay called “Moab is Assimilated. Bike Borg Moves South…Is Resistance Futile in San Juan County?” The essay included long quotes from Ashley Korenblat’s presentation to the San Juan County Commission last June. After the story was posted, Ms. Korenblat asked for the chance to reply. We offered her 1500 words and she used 750. But her comments only addressed her support for the Bishop Land Initiative and never addressed anything from the Borg story, and specifically my concerns that the kind of recreation/tourist growth she imagines for San Juan County would do little to address the economic needs of the county’s current population. Though some of her peers in the recreation industry took issue with us, suggesting I’d given Korenblat “a bum rap,” I was pleased to see she apparently had no quarrel with any of the specifics of the Borg story.
Here is the link to the original story:

‘MOAB IS ASSIMILATED…BIKE BORG MOVES SOUTH’ —Jim Stiles. http://www.canyoncountryzephyr.com/2014/02/03/moab-is-assimilated-bike-borg-moves-south-is-resistance-futile-in-san-juan-county-by-jim-stiles/

To read the PDF version of this article, click here.

To comment on this article, scroll to the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget the Zephyr ads! All links are hot!

co-doc renny3 distantduet4 faye-jun12 GCI elkriver

4 comments for “Pointblank: A Reply to Last Issue’s “Bike Borg” Story. The Bishop Public Lands Initiative, Local Control and Shared Values…by Ashley Korenblat

  1. Scott Grunder
    April 7, 2014 at 10:34 am

    What garbage, trash, fodder, excrement she espouses. She and her ilk need to leave the rest of Utah (and elsewhere) alone. It is bad enough that Moab has been assimilated and destroyed. Mountain bikes DO NOT BELONG IN OUR WILDERNESS!!!!! Not now or ever. I am an Edward Abbey acolyte and proud of it. Don’t you dare call refer to me or my like-minded brethren as someone who clings hopelessly to the Edward Abbey era. In fact, I take great offense that you have the temerity to even mention his name in your worthless response to Jim Stiles article exposing you for what you are. Like others, his writing was of enormous influence on me. His words galvanized me to head west, to get an education, to become a public servant, and protect our natural heritage. You are in no position to trade off our precious public lands in order to “optimize our public lands.” What the hell does that even mean? I hope others who feel as I do get involved. Otherwise we might be sharing our wilderness experience with hoards of fat tire enthusiasts.

  2. April 9, 2014 at 2:31 pm

    Virtually no one I talk to in San Juan County wants Moab-style industrial tourism. That’s just not authentic to who we are and what we want as a county. But that doesn’t mean it’s wise to ignore what’s already happening, much of it outside of our control. Nor is it helpful for us to call each other names and twist each other’s words. Ms. Korenblat makes a very valuable point about us all needing to work together to protect special places for future generations. That just doesn’t happen, in our current day in age, without people compromising. If we agree that some places are special enough to leave free from the impact of bikes, oil rigs, and ATVs, then we need to engage in a reasonable process for discussing where these areas should be located (and where they should not). If we don’t, we’ll likely end up with no special places left at all.

  3. Scott Thompson
    April 13, 2014 at 12:43 pm

    I appreciate Ashley taking the time to lay out what from her point of view is a reasonable resolution of competing interests.

    I think she is perceptive in saying that “I don’t think the people who are for smaller government want their children to breathe bad air, anymore than I think the people who want to save the earth want to give up all the modern conveniences of cars and cell phones.” Well, there it is. Thus far we the people are unwilling to do what it takes to have the kind of environment we’d like to live in.

    The consequences of our unwillingness will continue to pile up on us.

  4. Scott Grunder
    May 13, 2014 at 1:25 pm

    I can’t believe what I am reading. She represents reasonableness? Do you guys use the wilderness? Do you appreciate solitude? I am about as reasonable and objective as they come yet I strongly object to sharing wilderness areas and trails with mountain bikers! You have to be kidding me. You all don’t see a conflict of interest from this person who is a guide?

Leave a Reply to Scott Thompson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *